1.260 citiri

Reclamantul s-a plâns în temeiul articolului 3 din Convenție de suferința continuă pe care ar fi suferit-o din cauza birocrației excesive și a administrării inadecvate a justiției

25. In his observations submitted in reply to those of the Government the applicant complained under Article 3 of the Convention of the continuous suffering and discrimination he had allegedly endured on account of excessive bureaucracy and inadequate administration of justice in Georgia. The Court notes that the applicant introduced the above complaint only in his observations following the communication of the application. It cannot be considered as an elaboration of the applicant’s original complaints. Consequently, it falls outside the scope of the current application (compare, for instance, Saghinadze and Others v. Georgia, no. 18768/05, §§ 71 and 72, 27 May 2010 with further references therein).

Curtea Europeană a Drepturilor Omului
(Hotărârea din data de 11 martie 2021, Schrade împotriva Georgiei, disponibilă aici)

Back To Top